Rhodia, Inc. v. United States

54 Cust. Ct. 353, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2070
United States Customs Court·Decided March 22, 1965·No. No. 69160; protests 59/28669, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of yams in chief value of a synthetic textile similar in use to thrown silk not more advanced than singles, tram, or organzine and following the principles set forth in United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rhodia, Inc. v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 353, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2070 (cusc 1965).

54 Cust. Ct. 353 (Rhodia, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.