Rhodes v. Wingfield Orchards Inc.

125 S.E. 729, 33 Ga. App. 166, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 791
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 9, 1924
Docket15952
StatusPublished

This text of 125 S.E. 729 (Rhodes v. Wingfield Orchards Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rhodes v. Wingfield Orchards Inc., 125 S.E. 729, 33 Ga. App. 166, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 791 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Luke, J.

In this case a proceeding under section 825 of the Civil Code (1910) was instituted for the removal of an obstruction from an alleged private way over which the' plaintiffs claimed an easement by prescription under section 824. The ordinary rendered a judgment in favor of the defendant, a certiorari was overruled, and the plaintiffs excepted. “Before an applicant can have obstructions removed from a private way, he must not only show that there has been an uninterrupted use for more than seven years, but he must show that it is not more than fifteen feet wide, and that he has kept it open and in repair, and that it is the same fifteen feet originally appropriated.” Collier v. Farr, 81 Ga. 749 (7 S. E. 860). No error of law appearing, and the evidence being conflicting, the judgment of the court below must stand.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Collier v. Farr
7 S.E. 860 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 S.E. 729, 33 Ga. App. 166, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhodes-v-wingfield-orchards-inc-gactapp-1924.