Rhodes v. Wheeler

48 A.D. 361, 63 N.Y.S. 177
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1900·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Herrick, J. :

The substantial and material acts alleged in the plaintiffs’ complaint were committed, if at all, in the city of Binghamton, Broome ■ county. The great majority of the witnesses upon the crucial points in the ease evidently reside in-the city of .Binghamton.

A stipulation that the witnesses will swear to the facts as alleged in the. affidavit of the moving party is not sufficient; the party is entitled to their presence upon the trial and to the benefit of. their oral testimony, so that the court and jury may be better able to determine whether they are telling the truth or not.

An admission that witnesses will testify to certain facts is not an admission of the truth of such testimony, nor an admission of the facts themselves. (Ingal v. Stoddard, 35 App. Div. 539, 541.)

The order app'ealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs of motion, to abide the event of the action.

All' concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and . motion granted, with' ten dollars costs of motion, to abide the event of the action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rhodes v. Wheeler, 48 A.D. 361, 63 N.Y.S. 177 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

48 A.D. 361 (Rhodes v. Wheeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nelson v. Enos
117 P.2d 429 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)