Rhodes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rhodes v. State

542 S.W.3d 425

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 13, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105644

StatusPublished

This text of 542 S.W.3d 425 (Rhodes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rhodes v. State, 542 S.W.3d 425 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Mario Rhodes appeals from the circuit court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Mario Rhodes appeals from the circuit court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

542 S.W.3d 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhodes-v-state-moctapp-2018.