Rhodes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rhodes v. State

542 S.W.3d 425

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rhodes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 127 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 13, 2018·No. No. ED 105644·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Mario Rhodes appeals from the circuit court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Mario Rhodes appeals from the circuit court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Rhodes v. State, 542 S.W.3d 425 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

542 S.W.3d 425 (Rhodes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.