Rhodes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rhodes v. State

168 So. 3d 244, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8270, 2015 WL 3446298

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 29, 2015

DocketNo. 1D13-3912

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 168 So. 3d 244 (Rhodes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rhodes v. State, 168 So. 3d 244, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8270, 2015 WL 3446298 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Enrico Rhodes challenges his convictions and sentences for three counts of attempted second-degree murder, three counts of robbery, one count of fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer, and one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He raises several issues on appeal, none of which have merit, and so we affirm the convictions and sentences. However, as we found need to do in Masterson v. State, 133 So.3d 1085, 1086 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), we remand for the trial court to correct the written judgment to remove the word “aggravated” from the title of the crime for which Rhodes was convicted in Count 8. The judgment correctly cites section 316.1935(3)(a), Florida Statutes, and should show the offense as “fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer.”

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.

CLARK, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Enrico Rhodes challenges his convictions and sentences for three counts of attempted second-degree murder, three counts of robbery, one count of fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer, and one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He raises several issues on appeal, none of which have merit, and so we affirm the convictions and sentences. However, as we found need to do in Masterson v. State, 133 So.3d 1085, 1086 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), we remand for the trial court to correct the written judgment to remove the word “aggravated” from the title of the crime for which Rhodes was convicted in Count 8. The judgment correctly cites section 316.1935(3)(a), Florida Statutes, and should show the offense as “fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer.”

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with directions.

CLARK, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 So. 3d 244, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8270, 2015 WL 3446298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhodes-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack