Rhodes v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Rhodes v. State

106 So. 923, 21 Ala. App. 690

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 12, 1926

Docket3 Div. 502.

StatusPublished

This text of 106 So. 923 (Rhodes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rhodes v. State, 106 So. 923, 21 Ala. App. 690 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

No brief has come to the hands of the court, directing especial attention to claims of error. We are therefore left to a general review of the record, as is provided by statute. Objections to testimony are without merit. In each instance the rulings of the court were without error. Refused charges 5 and 6 omit a consideration of all the evidence. Refused charges 1, 2, 3, and 4 exact too high a degree of proof on the part of the state. The court in his oral charge correctly stated the law as to aiding and abetting in the commission of crime. The charges were properly refused. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

No brief has come to the hands of the court, directing especial attention to claims of error. We are therefore left to a general review of the record, as is provided by statute. Objections to testimony are without merit. In each instance the rulings of the court were without error. Refused charges 5 and 6 omit a consideration of all the evidence. Refused charges 1, 2, 3, and 4 exact too high a degree of proof on the part of the state. The court in his oral charge correctly stated the law as to aiding and abetting in the commission of crime. The charges were properly refused. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 So. 923, 21 Ala. App. 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhodes-v-state-alactapp-1926.