Rhodes v. State

174 So. 624, 234 Ala. 184, 1937 Ala. LEXIS 232
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided May 20, 1937·No. 6 Div. 63.·Published

Opinion

GARDNER, Justice.

The appeal is from a judgment of conviction of murder in the first degree, with the infliction of the death penalty.

In the absence of a bill of exceptions, charges refused are not here reviewable (Preston v. State, 231 Ala. 285, 164 So. 571), nor does the motion for a new trial present matter here for consideration.

There is no error apparent on the record. Let the judgment stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except KNIGHT, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rhodes v. State, 174 So. 624, 234 Ala. 184, 1937 Ala. LEXIS 232 (Ala. 1937).

174 So. 624 (Rhodes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Preston v. State
164 So. 571 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1935)