Rhodes v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Rhodes v. State

102 So. 919, 212 Ala. 698

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedDecember 18, 1924

Docket1 Div. 303.

StatusPublished

This text of 102 So. 919 (Rhodes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rhodes v. State, 102 So. 919, 212 Ala. 698 (Ala. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

The appeal in this case is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, requested charges refused to the defendant cannot be reviewed on appeal, as it will be presumed that the trial court correctly charged the law in the oral instructions to the jury. Moreover, the propositions of law stated in the charges refused defendant were fully covered by the numerous charges given at defendant’s request. No error appearing in the record, the judgment of conviction will be affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SOMERVILLE, J.

The appeal in this case is upon the record proper, there being no bill of exceptions. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, requested charges refused to the defendant cannot be reviewed on appeal, as it will be presumed that the trial court correctly charged the law in the oral instructions to the jury. Moreover, the propositions of law stated in the charges refused defendant were fully covered by the numerous charges given at defendant’s request. No error appearing in the record, the judgment of conviction will be affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

102 So. 919, 212 Ala. 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhodes-v-state-ala-1924.