Rhodes v. Rigg
20 F. Cas. 654, 1 Cranch 87
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedApril 15, 1802
StatusPublished
This text of 20 F. Cas. 654 (Rhodes v. Rigg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rhodes v. Rigg, 20 F. Cas. 654, 1 Cranch 87 (circtddc 1802).
Opinion
were of opinion that this affidavit was not sufficient to justify the admission of other evidence of the handwriting of the defendant, nor to dispense with the testimony of the subscribing witness. The plaintiff suffered a nonsuit, but the court reinstated the cause on payment of costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
20 F. Cas. 654, 1 Cranch 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhodes-v-rigg-circtddc-1802.