Rhodes v. Rhodes

114 A. 414, 92 N.J. Eq. 252, 7 Stock. 252, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 326
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 21, 1920·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lane.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Swayze, Trenci-iard. Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson—15. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rhodes v. Rhodes, 114 A. 414, 92 N.J. Eq. 252, 7 Stock. 252, 1920 N.J. LEXIS 326 (N.J. 1920).

114 A. 414 (Rhodes v. Rhodes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weinkrantz v. Weinkrantz
322 A.2d 184 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)
Rains v. Rains
8 A.2d 715 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)