Rhodes v. Rhodes

Montana Supreme Court

Rhodes v. Rhodes

DecidedJune 9, 2023

DocketDA 22-0754

StatusUnpublished

This text of Rhodes v. Rhodes (Rhodes v. Rhodes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rhodes v. Rhodes, (Mo. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

06/09/2023

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 22-0754

DA 22-0754

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: Ht.& JOHN P. RHODES, JUN 0 9 2023 Petitioner, Appellant and Bowen Greenwooa T:„slerk of Suprerne Coun Cross-Appellee, Stato of Monte r) -

ORDER v.

TRACY LABIN RHODES,

Respondent, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.

John P. Rhodes moves this Court to supplement the record. Tracy Labin Rhodes responds in opposition. John states that he seeks to supplement the record in this appeal of a dissolution with the four children's school attendance records for this past school year. Tracy points out that this inforrnation is not part of the record on appeal. Tracy posits that John has not provided a sufficient record, pursuant to M. R. App. P. 8(2), because there is a lack of transcripts. This Court's rules are clear. A record on appeal is defined as "the original papers and exhibits filed in the district court, the transcript of proceedings, if any, and a certified copy of the docket entries prepared by the clerk of the district court . . . ." M. R. App. P. 8(1). An appellant, such as John, has a duty to request the transcript of the proceedings. M. R. App. P. 8(3). While John filed a written notice of the necessary transcripts well after his notice of appeal, he did file it on February 3, 2023.1 This Court received the electronic transcript of the hearing on April 21, 2023. No basis exists for either request. Therefore,

The Clerk's office received and filed John's notice of transcripts deemed necessary for appeal on February 3, 2023, and then scanned into the electronic system on Monday, February 6, 2023. IT IS ORDERED that John's Motion to Supplement the Record with 2022-2023 School Attendance Records is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Tracy's Request for an Order concerning transcripts is DENIED, as moot. The Clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy of this Order to all parties. DATED this day of June, 2023. For the Court,

Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

06/09/2023

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 22-0754

DA 22-0754

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: Ht.& JOHN P. RHODES, JUN 0 9 2023 Petitioner, Appellant and Bowen Greenwooa T:„slerk of Suprerne Coun Cross-Appellee, Stato of Monte r) -

ORDER v.

TRACY LABIN RHODES,

Respondent, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.

John P. Rhodes moves this Court to supplement the record. Tracy Labin Rhodes responds in opposition. John states that he seeks to supplement the record in this appeal of a dissolution with the four children's school attendance records for this past school year. Tracy points out that this inforrnation is not part of the record on appeal. Tracy posits that John has not provided a sufficient record, pursuant to M. R. App. P. 8(2), because there is a lack of transcripts. This Court's rules are clear. A record on appeal is defined as "the original papers and exhibits filed in the district court, the transcript of proceedings, if any, and a certified copy of the docket entries prepared by the clerk of the district court . . . ." M. R. App. P. 8(1). An appellant, such as John, has a duty to request the transcript of the proceedings. M. R. App. P. 8(3). While John filed a written notice of the necessary transcripts well after his notice of appeal, he did file it on February 3, 2023.1 This Court received the electronic transcript of the hearing on April 21, 2023. No basis exists for either request. Therefore,

The Clerk's office received and filed John's notice of transcripts deemed necessary for appeal on February 3, 2023, and then scanned into the electronic system on Monday, February 6, 2023. IT IS ORDERED that John's Motion to Supplement the Record with 2022-2023 School Attendance Records is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Tracy's Request for an Order concerning transcripts is DENIED, as moot. The Clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy of this Order to all parties. DATED this day of June, 2023. For the Court,

Chief Justice

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Rhodes v. Rhodes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhodes-v-rhodes-mont-2023.