Rhodes v. Rhodes
539 So. 2d 610, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 699, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1375, 1989 WL 22560
Opinion
This is an appeal from a marriage dissolution judgment. Because the court erred in requiring the estate of the husband to pay support alimony after his death, we reverse and strike that provision from the judgment. O’Malley v. Pan American Bank of Orlando, 384 So.2d 1258 (Fla.1980); Cleveland v. Cleveland, 445 So.2d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); White v. White, 429 So.2d 730 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).
In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.
[611] AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rhodes v. Rhodes, 539 So. 2d 610, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 699, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1375, 1989 WL 22560 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
539 So. 2d 610 (Rhodes v. Rhodes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
White v. White
429 So. 2d 730 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
O'MALLEY v. Pan Am. Bank of Orlando
384 So. 2d 1258 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Cleveland v. Cleveland
445 So. 2d 392 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)