Rhodes v. Rhodes

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rhodes v. Rhodes

539 So. 2d 610, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 699, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1375, 1989 WL 22560

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 16, 1989

DocketNos. 88-467, 88-1748

StatusPublished

This text of 539 So. 2d 610 (Rhodes v. Rhodes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rhodes v. Rhodes, 539 So. 2d 610, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 699, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1375, 1989 WL 22560 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a marriage dissolution judgment. Because the court erred in requiring the estate of the husband to pay support alimony after his death, we reverse and strike that provision from the judgment. O’Malley v. Pan American Bank of Orlando, 384 So.2d 1258 (Fla.1980); Cleveland v. Cleveland, 445 So.2d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); White v. White, 429 So.2d 730 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.

[611]*611AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

ORFINGER and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI