Rhodes v. Rhodes
311 So. 2d 177, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13888
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 11, 1975·No. No. 73-1076·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We have carefully reviewed the briefs and record in this case, including the transcript of the testimony. Though the appellate questions are close, they are essentially questions of fact. The trial judge observed the witness and obviously rejected some aspects of the testimony. This is his prerogative. Accordingly, we feel obligated to affirm the order on appeal.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rhodes v. Rhodes, 311 So. 2d 177, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13888 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).
311 So. 2d 177 (Rhodes v. Rhodes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gornto v. Marks
311 So. 2d 177 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)