Rhodes v. Rhodes

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rhodes v. Rhodes

311 So. 2d 177, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13888

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 11, 1975

DocketNo. 73-1076

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 311 So. 2d 177 (Rhodes v. Rhodes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rhodes v. Rhodes, 311 So. 2d 177, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13888 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs and record in this case, including the transcript of the testimony. Though the appellate questions are close, they are essentially questions of fact. The trial judge observed the witness and obviously rejected some aspects of the testimony. This is his prerogative. Accordingly, we feel obligated to affirm the order on appeal.

Affirmed.

CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., and VANN, HAROLD R., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs and record in this case, including the transcript of the testimony. Though the appellate questions are close, they are essentially questions of fact. The trial judge observed the witness and obviously rejected some aspects of the testimony. This is his prerogative. Accordingly, we feel obligated to affirm the order on appeal.

Affirmed.

CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., and VANN, HAROLD R., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

311 So. 2d 177, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhodes-v-rhodes-fladistctapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack