Rhodes v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Rhodes v. Jones

191 S.E. 503, 55 Ga. App. 803, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 510

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 22, 1937

Docket26073

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 191 S.E. 503 (Rhodes v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rhodes v. Jones, 191 S.E. 503, 55 Ga. App. 803, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 510 (Ga. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Eelton, J.

Ike Jones sued out an attachment against Hey-ward Eranklin, which was levied on a mule to which E. G-. Rhodes and W. T. Rhodes, doing business under the name and style of Augusta Mule and Cattle Yard, filed a claim based on an unrecorded retention-of-title contract dated before the issuance and levy of the attachment. There was no error in the finding of the judge of the municipal court of Augusta, to the effect that the attachment lien was superior to the unrecorded contract. Code, §§ 67-111, 67-2501; Southern Iron & Equipment Co. v. Voyles, 138 Ga. 258 (75 S. E. 248, 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 375, Ann. Cas. 1913D, 369); Jones Motor Co. v. Finch Motor Co., 34 Ga. App. 399 (129 S. E. 915); Phillips & Crew Co. v. Drake, 13 Ga. App. [804]*804764 (79 S. E. 952); Hosch v. Smith, 31 Ga. App. 91 (119 S. E. 667); Evans Motors v. Hearn, 53 Ga. App. 703 (186 S. E. 751).

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eelton, J.

Ike Jones sued out an attachment against Hey-ward Eranklin, which was levied on a mule to which E. G-. Rhodes and W. T. Rhodes, doing business under the name and style of Augusta Mule and Cattle Yard, filed a claim based on an unrecorded retention-of-title contract dated before the issuance and levy of the attachment. There was no error in the finding of the judge of the municipal court of Augusta, to the effect that the attachment lien was superior to the unrecorded contract. Code, §§ 67-111, 67-2501; Southern Iron & Equipment Co. v. Voyles, 138 Ga. 258 (75 S. E. 248, 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 375, Ann. Cas. 1913D, 369); Jones Motor Co. v. Finch Motor Co., 34 Ga. App. 399 (129 S. E. 915); Phillips & Crew Co. v. Drake, 13 Ga. App. [804]*804764 (79 S. E. 952); Hosch v. Smith, 31 Ga. App. 91 (119 S. E. 667); Evans Motors v. Hearn, 53 Ga. App. 703 (186 S. E. 751).

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens, P. J., and Sutton, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 S.E. 503, 55 Ga. App. 803, 1937 Ga. App. LEXIS 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhodes-v-jones-gactapp-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack