Rhodes v. Hogg & Allen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Rhodes v. Hogg & Allen

209 S.E.2d 794, 286 N.C. 40, 1974 N.C. LEXIS 1176

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedNovember 26, 1974

DocketNo. 86

StatusPublished

This text of 209 S.E.2d 794 (Rhodes v. Hogg & Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rhodes v. Hogg & Allen, 209 S.E.2d 794, 286 N.C. 40, 1974 N.C. LEXIS 1176 (N.C. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

BRANCH, Justice.

Other than the party plaintiff and the amount in controversy, the material facts in this case are the' same as in the [41]*41case of Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, 286 N.C. 24, 209 S.E. 2d 795, filed this day.

For the reasons stated in that case, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and this cause is remanded to that Court with direction that the cause be remanded to the Superior Court of Wilkes County for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

Chief Justice Bobbitt not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI