Rhodes v. Coats
215 S.W. 470, 1919 Tex. App. LEXIS 1050
Opinions
Rhodes appeals from a judgment against him for sums aggregating $2,152.92, with interest and foreclosure of lien. The judgment was by default, though due service is recited in the judgment. There is no citation, waiver, or entry of appearance shown by the transcript. This condition of the record necessitates reversal. Palomas L. C. Co. v. Good,
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rhodes v. Coats, 215 S.W. 470, 1919 Tex. App. LEXIS 1050 (Tex. Ct. App. 1919).
215 S.W. 470 (Rhodes v. Coats) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peterson & Tvrdik v. Mueller-Huber Grain Co.
58 S.W.2d 890 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Head v. Texas State Bank
16 S.W.2d 298 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1929)