Rhodes v. Clark

City of New York Municipal Court

Rhodes v. Clark

21 Misc. 791, 47 N.Y.S. 1147

DecidedOctober 15, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Misc. 791 (Rhodes v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rhodes v. Clark, 21 Misc. 791, 47 N.Y.S. 1147 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The notice of dishonor s,ent to the appellant was sufficient. It was only necessary to notify him of the fact of the nonpayment of the notes in suit, within a reasonable time 'after the nonpayment.

Such notice was certainly given in this instance.

The evidence certainly sustains the verdict, and in our opinion preponderates in plaintiff’s favor, and, therefore, judgment is affirmed, with costsr

Present: Fitzsimons, Conlan and Schuchman, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI