Rhoden v. State
223 So. 2d 80, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5630
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rhoden v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 227 So. 2d 349 →
Opinion
The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed. See Mixon v. State, 54 So.2d 190 (Fla.1951), and Thomas v. State, 201 So.2d 834 (Fla.App.1967).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rhoden v. State, 223 So. 2d 80, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5630 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).
223 So. 2d 80 (Rhoden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thomas v. State
201 So. 2d 834 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Mixon v. State
54 So. 2d 190 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1951)