Rhoden v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Rhoden v. State

6 So. 2d 378, 149 Fla. 531, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 825

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedFebruary 17, 1942

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 So. 2d 378 (Rhoden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rhoden v. State, 6 So. 2d 378, 149 Fla. 531, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 825 (Fla. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was indicted charged with the' offense of murder in the first degree and, on trial, was convicted of the crime of manslaughter, from which judgment he has prosecuted this appeal.

The only question presented for our consideration is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment. The transcript of the testimony has been examined and considered and is found to be amply sufficient to have sustained a verdict and judgment of a higher degree of unlawful homicide than manslaughter.

On the entire record no reversible error is made to appear.

The judgment is affirmed.

*532 So ordered.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BUFORD and THOMAS, JJ., concurring. CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI