Rhoda v. Alameda County

58 Cal. 357, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 233
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1881·No. No. 7,459·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The Court:

The Court found that the vault, at the time of its removal, was a fixture, and part of the realty, and was the property of plaintiffs; that defendants had no legal right to remove it; and that its value, to be sold in open market, was, at the time of its removal, not over five hundred dollars; and thereupon the Court rendered judgment for that amount. In such case the measure of damages is the value of the article as it was in place as a part of the realty, immediately preceding its removal; not what it would sell for in open market removed from the building. (Civ. Code, § 3333; Whitbeck v. N. Y. Central R. R. Co., 36 Barb. 644.)

Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rhoda v. Alameda County, 58 Cal. 357, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 233 (Cal. 1881).

58 Cal. 357 (Rhoda v. Alameda County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cornell v. Sennes
18 Cal. App. 3d 126 (California Court of Appeal, 1971)
Wilmerton v. Morton
169 P.2d 992 (California Court of Appeal, 1946)
Givens v. Markall
124 P.2d 839 (California Court of Appeal, 1942)
Los Angeles Trust & Savings Bank v. Bortenstein
190 P. 850 (California Court of Appeal, 1920)
Dutro v. Kennedy
9 Mont. 101 (Montana Supreme Court, 1889)