Rhoads v. United States
This text of 49 Cust. Ct. 225 (Rhoads v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon belting and following the principles set forth in United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items marked “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1530(b) (1), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), for belting leather, by similitude under paragraph 1559, as amended, and the items marked “B” at 15 percent under paragraph 913(a), as modified, supra, for cotton belting for machinery, by similitude, as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 Cust. Ct. 225, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhoads-v-united-states-cusc-1962.