Rhoads v. United States

49 Cust. Ct. 225, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1063
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedSeptember 13, 1962
DocketNo. 67025; protests 61/6572, etc. (Philadelphia)
StatusPublished

This text of 49 Cust. Ct. 225 (Rhoads v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rhoads v. United States, 49 Cust. Ct. 225, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1063 (cusc 1962).

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon belting and following the principles set forth in United States v. Steinberg Bros. (47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items marked “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1530(b) (1), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), for belting leather, by similitude under paragraph 1559, as amended, and the items marked “B” at 15 percent under paragraph 913(a), as modified, supra, for cotton belting for machinery, by similitude, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Steinberg Bros.
47 C.C.P.A. 47 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 Cust. Ct. 225, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhoads-v-united-states-cusc-1962.