Rhoads v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Rhoads v. State

1912 OK CR 29, 124 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 703, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 361

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided January 3, 1912·No. No. A-870.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A. L. Rhoads, plaintiff in error, was eonvieted in the county court of Canadian county, and was sentenced to pay a fine of one hundred dollars. The judgment was entered May 25, 1910. An examination of the record fails to disclose any prejudicial error. All the questions raised by the petition have heretofore been settled by the decisions of this court. Finding no prejudicial error in the proceedings had, the judgment of the county court of Canadian county is affirmed, and the cause remanded thereto, with direction to enforce the judgment and sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A. L. Rhoads, plaintiff in error, was eonvieted in the county court of Canadian county, and was sentenced to pay a fine of one hundred dollars. The judgment was entered May 25, 1910. An examination of the record fails to disclose any prejudicial error. All the questions raised by the petition have heretofore been settled by the decisions of this court. Finding no prejudicial error in the proceedings had, the judgment of the county court of Canadian county is affirmed, and the cause remanded thereto, with direction to enforce the judgment and sentence.

Rhoads v. State, 1912 OK CR 29, 124 P. 1133, 6 Okla. Crim. 703, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 361 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

1912 OK CR 29 (Rhoads v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.