Rhoads v. Sheriff
This text of 509 P.2d 287 (Rhoads v. Sheriff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Appellant, charged with first degree arson, a felony under NRS 205.010, contends the trial court erred in failing to grant habeas because there was insufficient evidence adduced at the preliminary hearing to establish probable cause. The record before us reflects that the state met its burden of showing probable cause that the offense was committed and that appellant committed it. NRS 171.206. See O’Briant v. State, 72 Nev. 100, 295 P.2d 396 (1956).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
509 P.2d 287, 89 Nev. 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhoads-v-sheriff-nev-1973.