Rhoades v. Allen
76 Mass. 35
Opinion
The statute bar to the action is not removed by the defendant’s letter to the plaintiff, which neither acknowledges that she has a legal claim against him, nor makes any "promise to pay her claim. See Bangs v. Hall, 2 Pick. 368; Bailey v. Crane, 21 Pick. 323; Purdy v. Austin, 3 Wend. 187; M Culloch v. Dawes, 9 D. & R. 40; Morrell v. Frith, 3 M. & W. 402.
Judgment for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rhoades v. Allen, 76 Mass. 35 (Mass. 1857).
76 Mass. 35 (Rhoades v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Purdy v. Austin
3 Wend. 187 (New York Supreme Court, 1829)