Rhoades v. Allen

76 Mass. 35
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 15, 1857·Published

Opinion

Metcalf, J.

The statute bar to the action is not removed by the defendant’s letter to the plaintiff, which neither acknowledges that she has a legal claim against him, nor makes any "promise to pay her claim. See Bangs v. Hall, 2 Pick. 368; Bailey v. Crane, 21 Pick. 323; Purdy v. Austin, 3 Wend. 187; M Culloch v. Dawes, 9 D. & R. 40; Morrell v. Frith, 3 M. & W. 402.

Judgment for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rhoades v. Allen, 76 Mass. 35 (Mass. 1857).

76 Mass. 35 (Rhoades v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Purdy v. Austin
3 Wend. 187 (New York Supreme Court, 1829)