Rhoades v. Allen

76 Mass. 35
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1857
StatusPublished

This text of 76 Mass. 35 (Rhoades v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rhoades v. Allen, 76 Mass. 35 (Mass. 1857).

Opinion

Metcalf, J.

The statute bar to the action is not removed by the defendant’s letter to the plaintiff, which neither acknowledges that she has a legal claim against him, nor makes any "promise to pay her claim. See Bangs v. Hall, 2 Pick. 368; Bailey v. Crane, 21 Pick. 323; Purdy v. Austin, 3 Wend. 187; M Culloch v. Dawes, 9 D. & R. 40; Morrell v. Frith, 3 M. & W. 402.

Judgment for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Purdy v. Austin
3 Wend. 187 (New York Supreme Court, 1829)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 Mass. 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhoades-v-allen-mass-1857.