R.H.J. v. Juvenile Officer

Missouri Court of Appeals

R.H.J. v. Juvenile Officer

221 S.W.3d 466, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 701, 2007 WL 1345836

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 9, 2007·No. No. WD 67389·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Jack (“Father”) appeals a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Henry County terminating his parental rights to his three children, M.D.J., M.N.J., and M.J. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Jack (“Father”) appeals a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Henry County terminating his parental rights to his three children, M.D.J., M.N.J., and M.J. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

R.H.J. v. Juvenile Officer, 221 S.W.3d 466, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 701, 2007 WL 1345836 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

221 S.W.3d 466 (R.H.J. v. Juvenile Officer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.