Rhita B. Behrman Interiors, Inc. v. Braman Cadillac, Inc.
This text of 407 So. 2d 282 (Rhita B. Behrman Interiors, Inc. v. Braman Cadillac, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This appeal questions the correctness of a judgment on the pleadings rendered in favor of the appellee in an action for an alleged breach of contract to give a free 1980 Toyota with each purchase of a new 1979 Cadillac or a demonstrator pursuant to an advertisement placed in a newspaper by appellee which read as follows:
SATURDAY ONLY
CHRISTMAS SPECIAL
Buy any new 1979 Cadillac
or 1979 Cadillac Demo...
Get a Brand New 1980
TOYOTA
TERCEL
FREE!
A careful examination of the pleadings conclusively establishes that there is no genuine triable issue as to any material facts, and that appellee is entitled to a judgment on the pleadings as a matter of law. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is affirmed. Williams v. Howard, 329 So.2d 277 (Fla.1976); American Housing Systems Corp. v. Country Club of Miami Corp., 342 So.2d 1026 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Barentine v. Clements, 328 So.2d 878 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Bradham v. Hayes Enterprises, Inc., 306 So.2d 568 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
407 So. 2d 282, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhita-b-behrman-interiors-inc-v-braman-cadillac-inc-fladistctapp-1981.