Rhinehart v. O'Connor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rhinehart v. O'Connor

173 A.D. 942, 158 N.Y.S. 337

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1916

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 173 A.D. 942 (Rhinehart v. O'Connor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rhinehart v. O'Connor, 173 A.D. 942, 158 N.Y.S. 337 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The boundaries of the lands attempted to be described are vague and indefinite on the southern and western sides of the lands assessed. An assessment for taxes and a sale under it, taking effect as an execution of a statute power, must be construed strictly so as to identify the land and fix its size and location. Here the west bound was upon a so-called highway within the land and not properly bounding it. The southern bound on the highway, as stated, is hopelessly wrong, so that that side line cannot be fixed even after the tax purchase and attempted occupation. At the trial the defendant grantee admitted that he had not ascertained where his southern bounds ran. This is inadequate. (Erschler v. Lennox, 11 App. Div. 515; Oakley v. Healey, 38 Hun, 344; Blackwell Tax Titles [5th ed.], § 765.) Such an insufficient description is not helped out by recording under Tax Law, sections 131, 133.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The boundaries of the lands attempted to be described are vague and indefinite on the southern and western sides of the lands assessed. An assessment for taxes and a sale under it, taking effect as an execution of a statute power, must be construed strictly so as to identify the land and fix its size and location. Here the west bound was upon a so-called highway within the land and not properly bounding it. The southern bound on the highway, as stated, is hopelessly wrong, so that that side line cannot be fixed even after the tax purchase and attempted occupation. At the trial the defendant grantee admitted that he had not ascertained where his southern bounds ran. This is inadequate. (Erschler v. Lennox, 11 App. Div. 515; Oakley v. Healey, 38 Hun, 344; Blackwell Tax Titles [5th ed.], § 765.) Such an insufficient description is not helped out by recording under Tax Law, sections 131, 133.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 A.D. 942, 158 N.Y.S. 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhinehart-v-oconnor-nyappdiv-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack