Rhinecold Alaska, Inc. v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 129, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2540
Opinion
When this case was called for trial, there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff, and defendant moved to dismiss the protest for lack of prosecution.
It apearing from the official papers that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it is dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rhinecold Alaska, Inc. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 129, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2540 (cusc 1967).
58 Cust. Ct. 129 (Rhinecold Alaska, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.