Rhinecold Alaska, Inc. v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 129, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2540
This text of 58 Cust. Ct. 129 (Rhinecold Alaska, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rhinecold Alaska, Inc. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 129, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2540 (cusc 1967).
Opinion
When this case was called for trial, there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff, and defendant moved to dismiss the protest for lack of prosecution.
It apearing from the official papers that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it is dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
58 Cust. Ct. 129, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhinecold-alaska-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1967.