Rhiel v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (In re Foster)
This text of 458 B.R. 391 (Rhiel v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (In re Foster)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
After reviewing the record and the parties’ briefs, the Panel determines that the bankruptcy court did not err in granting summary judgment against the trustee and in favor of BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP. We therefore affirm for the reasons stated in the bankruptcy court’s well-written opinion entered on March 23, 2011, Rhiel v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, (In re Foster), 448 B.R. 914 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 2011), and for the reasons stated in the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s opinion entered on June 24, 2011, Rogan v. Fifth Third Mortgage Co., (In re Rowe), 452 B.R. 591 (6th Cir. BAP 2011) (analyzing a similar issue under Kentucky law).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
458 B.R. 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhiel-v-bac-home-loans-servicing-lp-in-re-foster-bap6-2011.