Rhett v. Scott

Fifth Circuit

Rhett v. Scott

90 F. App'x 80

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 24, 2004·No. 03-10812·Unpublished

Opinion

*81 PER CURIAM. 1

Dr. William Gonzalez and Dr. Tim Re-vell appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment in Cardell Rhett, Jr.’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The district court determined that Rhett had produced sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact regarding deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s determination. Nerren v. Livingston Police Dep’t, 86 F.3d 469, 472 (5th Cir.1996).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

1

. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*81 PER CURIAM. 1

Dr. William Gonzalez and Dr. Tim Re-vell appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment in Cardell Rhett, Jr.’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The district court determined that Rhett had produced sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact regarding deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s determination. Nerren v. Livingston Police Dep’t, 86 F.3d 469, 472 (5th Cir.1996).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

1

. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Rhett v. Scott, 90 F. App'x 80 (5th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

90 F. App'x 80 (Rhett v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related