Rhett v. Scott
This text of 90 F. App'x 80 (Rhett v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dr. William Gonzalez and Dr. Tim Re-vell appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment in Cardell Rhett, Jr.’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The district court determined that Rhett had produced sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact regarding deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s determination. Nerren v. Livingston Police Dep’t, 86 F.3d 469, 472 (5th Cir.1996).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
. Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 F. App'x 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhett-v-scott-ca5-2004.