Rhee v. Rhee

82 A.D.2d 731, 440 N.Y.S.2d 545, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14355

This text of 82 A.D.2d 731 (Rhee v. Rhee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rhee v. Rhee, 82 A.D.2d 731, 440 N.Y.S.2d 545, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14355 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Fraiman, J.), entered on June 4, 1980, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Concur — Ross, J.P., Markewich, Fein and Lynch, JJ.

Bloom, J., concurs in a memorandum as follows: If, as defendant contends, the judgment entered after trial, insofar as it deals with the disposition of the proceeds to be realized upon the sale of the Hawaiian property, fails to accurately reflect the decision of the trial court, the appropriate remedy is an application to resettle the judgment. In all other respects I agree with the determination of the Trial Judge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 A.D.2d 731, 440 N.Y.S.2d 545, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhee-v-rhee-nyappdiv-1981.