Rheams v. Marler

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 21, 2003
Docket02-30959
StatusUnpublished

This text of Rheams v. Marler (Rheams v. Marler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rheams v. Marler, (5th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 20, 2003

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

No. 02-30959 Summary Calendar

HELEN RHEAMS, on behalf of Walter James Rheams; TAMMY RHEAMS; ALISHA MONIQUE THOMAS, on behalf of Jamilah Monet Rheams,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

VICTOR MARLER, ETC.; ET AL.,

Defendants,

VICTOR MARLER, Officer; UNITED NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.; JASON POE; LARRY JONES, Special Agent; WILLIE GRAVES; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CV-912 --------------------

Before GARWOOD, WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellants appeal from a judgment dismissing their 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 suit pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994).

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-30959 -2-

They assign error to the district court’s determination that

Walter Rheams’s pending criminal proceedings mandated that the

suit be dismissed or, alternatively, stayed until resolution of

the criminal proceedings. Rheams’s death during the pendency of

this appeal, however, necessarily brings a premature end to his

criminal proceedings. See United States v. Estate of Parsons,

314 F.3d 745, 748 (5th Cir. 2002). We therefore vacate the

judgment of the district court dismissing the suit and remand the

case for further proceedings.

VACATED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heck v. Humphrey
512 U.S. 477 (Supreme Court, 1994)
United States v. Estate of Parsons ex rel. Millar
314 F.3d 745 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rheams v. Marler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rheams-v-marler-ca5-2003.