Rhea v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

81 So. 3d 537, 2012 WL 385529, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1762
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 8, 2012
DocketNo. 4D11-3141
StatusPublished

This text of 81 So. 3d 537 (Rhea v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rhea v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 81 So. 3d 537, 2012 WL 385529, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1762 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. “Whether [an] employee left [his or] her job voluntarily and without good cause is a question of fact within the province of the unemployment appeals referee.” Grossman v. Jewish Cvity. Ctr. of Greater Fort Lauderdale, Inc., 704 So.2d 714, 716 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). See also Augustin v. State Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 906 So.2d 1238, 1239 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (appellate court must sustain referee’s findings based upon credibility determinations supported by competent substantial evidence).

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grossman v. Jewish Community Center
704 So. 2d 714 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Augustin v. STATE UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
906 So. 2d 1238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 So. 3d 537, 2012 WL 385529, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rhea-v-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2012.