Rhea v. Holston Salt & Plaster Co.

59 Ala. 182
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1877·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CüRIAM.—

This suit being on an account and not on an instrument of writing ascertaining the plaintiff’s demand (Code of 1876, § 3032); and the judgment being by default, without the intervention of a jury, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.—Porter v. Benbow, 38 Ala. 343.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rhea v. Holston Salt & Plaster Co., 59 Ala. 182 (Ala. 1877).

59 Ala. 182 (Rhea v. Holston Salt & Plaster Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Drinkard v. Premier Refining Co.
90 So. 54 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1921)
Florida Nursery & Trading Co. v. Watson
77 So. 391 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1917)
Greer & Walker v. Liipfert-Scales Co.
47 So. 307 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1908)