Rhatigan v. Power

282 A.D. 838, 123 N.Y.S.2d 758, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5108
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 4, 1953·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur; Nolan, P. J., and Schmidt, J., dissent and vote to reverse, with the following memorandum: Concededly appellant was at the time of his registration and enrollment in 1952 a qualified voter in the district in which he was registered. Consequently, although he may have given erroneous information in connection with his registration, his name was not unlawfully entered on the register and should not have been stricken therefrom pursuant to section 331 of the Election Law. Neither should his enrollment have been cancelled pursuant to section 332. There is no evidence that appellant made any false statement in his declaration pursuant to section 174 of the Election Law, upon which he was enrolled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rhatigan v. Power, 282 A.D. 838, 123 N.Y.S.2d 758, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5108 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

282 A.D. 838 (Rhatigan v. Power) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roosevelt v. Power
22 Misc. 2d 1074 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)