Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/R.H. v. State

R.H. v. State

711 So. 2d 647, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7595, 1998 WL 335980
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in R.H. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3840 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 1998·No. No. 98-658·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There was evidence from which the trier of fact could conclude that appellant was guilty of burglarizing a vehicle which at the time was occupied, according to appellant’s own testimony, by a person unknown to the appellant. Therefore a conviction for burglary of an occupied conveyance, pursuant to section 810.02(3)(d), Florida Statutes (1997) was appropriate.

AFFIRMED.

W. SHARP and HARRIS, JJ., and ORFINGER, M., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R.H. v. State, 711 So. 2d 647, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7595, 1998 WL 335980 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

711 So. 2d 647 (R.H. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.