Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/R.H. v. State

R.H. v. State

634 So. 2d 321, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3289, 1994 WL 113632
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 7, 1994
DocketNo. 93-3584
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 634 So. 2d 321 (R.H. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R.H. v. State, 634 So. 2d 321, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3289, 1994 WL 113632 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from an order of the trial court requiring appellant’s employer to deduct $31 per month from appellant’s pay to satisfy a prior order of restitution. We must reverse because there is no statutory or rule authority permitting the trial court to impose income deduction as part of restitution in juvenile cases. See § 39.058, Fla.Stat. (1991); § 39.054, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1992); contrast § 775.089(12)(a)1, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1992).

BOOTH, ALLEN, and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re J.L.A.
641 So. 2d 191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
P.W. v. State
640 So. 2d 1192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
634 So. 2d 321, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3289, 1994 WL 113632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rh-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.