R.H. v. State
634 So. 2d 321, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3289, 1994 WL 113632
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 7, 1994·No. No. 93-3584·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
This cause is before us on appeal from an order of the trial court requiring appellant’s employer to deduct $31 per month from appellant’s pay to satisfy a prior order of restitution. We must reverse because there is no statutory or rule authority permitting the trial court to impose income deduction as part of restitution in juvenile cases. See § 39.058, Fla.Stat. (1991); § 39.054, Fla.Stat. (Supp.1992); contrast § 775.089(12)(a)1, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1992).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
R.H. v. State, 634 So. 2d 321, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 3289, 1994 WL 113632 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
634 So. 2d 321 (R.H. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re J.L.A.
641 So. 2d 191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
P.W. v. State
640 So. 2d 1192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)