R.G. Industries, Inc. v. Balsiger

502 So. 2d 1378, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 695, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7114
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 4, 1987
DocketNo. 4-86-2906
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 502 So. 2d 1378 (R.G. Industries, Inc. v. Balsiger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R.G. Industries, Inc. v. Balsiger, 502 So. 2d 1378, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 695, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7114 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We treat this petition for writ of prohibition as a petition for certiorari. Fla.R. App.P. 9.040(c).

Jack Beck was killed by the accidental discharge of a handgun. Two proceedings resulted:

[1379]*13791. A petition for the administration of his estate was filed in Indian River County in December, 1985.
2. In November 1986, the personal representative filed a wrongful death/products liability action against the handgun manufacturer, R.G. Industries, Inc., in Brevard County.

Before the wrongful death action was filed the personal representative sought discovery in the estate proceeding from R.G. Industries, which discovery could only be relevant to the wrongful death claim. R.G. Industries unsuccessfully sought a protective order and it now seeks review here.1

The simple answer to the instant question is found in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(1):

Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter of the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or the claim or defense of any other party, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition and location of any books, documents or other tangible things.... [Emphasis added.]

Since R.G. Industries, Inc. is not a party to the estate proceeding and since the wrongful death/products liability action and its issues can not be litigated in the estate proceeding, we hold that discovery in the wrongful death/products liability suit is not relevant and can not be had in the estate proceeding.

We grant certiorari and remand with instructions to grant protection to R.G. Industries, Inc. from the discovery and efforts made by the personal representative in the estate proceeding.

Certiorari granted.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Sugar Corp. v. Estate of Mullins
211 So. 3d 110 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Suburban Propane v. Estate of Pitcher
564 So. 2d 1118 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
502 So. 2d 1378, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 695, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rg-industries-inc-v-balsiger-fladistctapp-1987.