Rff Family Partnership, Lp v. Link Development LLC

797 F. Supp. 2d 187, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79753, 2011 WL 2748613
CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts
DecidedJuly 8, 2011
DocketCivil Action 11-10968-NMG
StatusPublished

This text of 797 F. Supp. 2d 187 (Rff Family Partnership, Lp v. Link Development LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rff Family Partnership, Lp v. Link Development LLC, 797 F. Supp. 2d 187, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79753, 2011 WL 2748613 (D. Mass. 2011).

Opinion

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

GORTON, District Judge.

Plaintiff RFF Family Partnership, LP (“RFF”) moves for a preliminary injunction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65. Defendants Link Development LLC (“Link”), Jeffrey B. Karll (“Karll”), Robert V. Wallace (“Wallace”), in his capacity as Trustee of BD Lending Trust (“BD Lending”), and Russell and Associates LLC (“Russell”) have not opposed the motion.

Upon consideration of plaintiffs Application for Preliminary Injunction and because no opposition has been filed by any of the defendants, plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Docket No. 6) is ALLOWED and it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED as follows:

1) Link Development LLC, its principal Jeffrey Karll, and their officers, agents, servants or employees, including without limitation Russell & Associates LLC, are enjoined from directly or indirectly transferring, alienating, selling, conveying, encumbering, hypothecating, assigning, dissipating, pledging, distributing or destroying any interest in or proceeds derived from the action captioned Link Development LLC v. Stuart Sojcher et al., Civil Action No. SUCV2006-05242, currently pending in the Massachusetts Superior Court Department of Suffolk County, and a related consolidated action captioned Link Development LLC v. Stuart Sojcher et al., Land Court Department No. 336908;
2) No security is required pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(c).

This preliminary injunction shall remain in full force and effect until the case is *188 decided on the merits or until modified by further order of this Court.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
797 F. Supp. 2d 187, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79753, 2011 WL 2748613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rff-family-partnership-lp-v-link-development-llc-mad-2011.