R.F. v. State

549 So. 2d 1169, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2376, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5569
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 1989·No. No. 89-0375·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse that portion of the order on restitution awarding Marjorie Lois Geprich the sum of $15,000 to be paid by the appellant.

In the instant case, contrary to the requirements of section 39.11(l)(a)l, Florida Statute (1987), there was no determination by the court that the amount of restitution ordered by the court was an amount the child could reasonably be expected to pay. In effect, the trial court acknowledged several times at the restitution hearing that the $15,000 the court ordered as restitution would inevitably be uncollectible. Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the order on restitution awarding Marjorie Lois Gep-rich the sum of $15,000 to be paid by the appellant. In all other respects we affirm the order on restitution as it relates to appellant.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DELL, GUNTHER and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R.F. v. State, 549 So. 2d 1169, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2376, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5569 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

549 So. 2d 1169 (R.F. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

A.J. v. State
677 So. 2d 935 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
In Interest of JM
601 So. 2d 604 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
In the Interest of J.N.
578 So. 2d 42 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
In the Interest of J.S.
557 So. 2d 231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)