Reznik v. Santaella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reznik v. Santaella

89 A.D.2d 858, 453 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18020

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 2, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 89 A.D.2d 858 (Reznik v. Santaella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reznik v. Santaella, 89 A.D.2d 858, 453 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18020 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law (erroneously denominated a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78) to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated November 20, 1981, which affirmed a determination of the State Division of Human Rights dismissing the complaint of petitioner on a finding that there was no probable cause to believe that his employer had engaged in an unlawful discriminatory practice because of his creed. Order confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. (See 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc, v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 ÑY2d 176; State Div. of Human Rights v Columbia Univ. in City of N.Y., 39 NY2d 612.) Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law (erroneously denominated a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78) to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated November 20, 1981, which affirmed a determination of the State Division of Human Rights dismissing the complaint of petitioner on a finding that there was no probable cause to believe that his employer had engaged in an unlawful discriminatory practice because of his creed. Order confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. (See 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc, v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 ÑY2d 176; State Div. of Human Rights v Columbia Univ. in City of N.Y., 39 NY2d 612.) Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 A.D.2d 858, 453 N.Y.S.2d 375, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reznik-v-santaella-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack