Rezash v. Bank of Two Rivers

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Rezash v. Bank of Two Rivers

223 N.W. 791, 199 Wis. 419, 1929 Wisc. LEXIS 201

Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided October 8, 1929·Published

Opinions

The following opinion was filed March 5, 1929:

Eschweiler, J.

Mr. Chief Justice Vinje taking no part in this appeal, and Mr. Justice Rosen'berry, Mr. Justice Doerfler, and Mr. Justice Stevens being of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, Mr. Justice Owen, Mr. Justice Crownhart, and the wrjter that it should be reversed and a new trial granted, it follows under the rule that,the judgment must be affirmed.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was granted on April 30, 1929, and the cause was reargued on September 14, 1929.

The following opinion was filed October 8, 1929:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The following opinion was filed March 5, 1929:

Eschweiler, J.

Mr. Chief Justice Vinje taking no part in this appeal, and Mr. Justice Rosen'berry, Mr. Justice Doerfler, and Mr. Justice Stevens being of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, Mr. Justice Owen, Mr. Justice Crownhart, and the wrjter that it should be reversed and a new trial granted, it follows under the rule that,the judgment must be affirmed.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was granted on April 30, 1929, and the cause was reargued on September 14, 1929.

The following opinion was filed October 8, 1929:

Rezash v. Bank of Two Rivers, 223 N.W. 791, 199 Wis. 419, 1929 Wisc. LEXIS 201 (Wis. 1929).

Pincite

223 N.W. 791 (Rezash v. Bank of Two Rivers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related