Reza Vafaiyan A/K/A Gholamreza Vafaiyan v. State
This text of Reza Vafaiyan A/K/A Gholamreza Vafaiyan v. State (Reza Vafaiyan A/K/A Gholamreza Vafaiyan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-18-00352-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
REZA VAFAIYAN A/K/A GHOLAMREZA VAFAIYAN, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 250th District Court of Travis County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
ORDER Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Benavides Order Per Curiam
On October 22, 2018, appellant filed a pro se “Motion for 60 Day Time After
Receiving Appellate Record to Reply To AG Motion to Dismiss the Appeal and Request
for Appellate Record and Proper Notification.” We construe the motion, in part, as a
request for a copy of the clerk’s and reporter’s records. The Court has ascertained that
there is no reporter’s record. The clerk’s record reflects that appellant filed an affidavit
of indigence and no contest has been filed. Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145 governs a party’s claim that the party is unable
to afford costs for preparation of the appellate record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145. A party
who files a statement of inability to afford payments of court costs cannot be required to
pay costs except by order of the court. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(a). Cost are defined to
include “fees charged by the clerk or court reporter for preparation of the appellate
record.” See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(c).
Appellant is currently unable to prepare his brief because he has not been provided
with a copy of the clerk’s record. Accordingly, we GRANT appellant’s motion for a copy
of the clerk’s record, ORDER that the trial court provide appellant with a paper copy of
the clerk’s record at no cost on or before December 7, 2018, and that the trial court notify
this Court as to the date upon which the record was mailed to appellant.
Appellant also requested a second extension to respond to the State’s motion to
dismiss. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED in part and he shall file his response to the
Attorney General’s motion to dismiss within forty-five days of receiving the clerk’s record.
He shall also file appellant’s brief within sixty days of receiving this order. The State shall
file its response brief within 30 days of appellant filing his brief with the Clerk of this Court.
If this Court does not receive appellant’s brief as ordered, we may sua sponte dismiss the
appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2 (b).
Delivered and filed the 27th day of November, 2018.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reza Vafaiyan A/K/A Gholamreza Vafaiyan v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reza-vafaiyan-aka-gholamreza-vafaiyan-v-state-texapp-2018.