Reywal Co. v. City of Dublin

Ohio Supreme Court

Reywal Co. v. City of Dublin

128 Ohio St. 3d 270

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 9, 2010·No. No. 2010-1435·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed in judgment only on the authority of Campbell v. Carlisle, 127 Ohio St.3d 275, 2010-Ohio-5707, 939 N.E.2d 153, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for application of Campbell v. Carlisle.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer and Cupp, JJ., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed in judgment only on the authority of Campbell v. Carlisle, 127 Ohio St.3d 275, 2010-Ohio-5707, 939 N.E.2d 153, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for application of Campbell v. Carlisle.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer and Cupp, JJ., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

Reywal Co. v. City of Dublin, 128 Ohio St. 3d 270 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

128 Ohio St. 3d 270 (Reywal Co. v. City of Dublin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related