Reywal Co. v. City of Dublin

Ohio Supreme Court

Reywal Co. v. City of Dublin

128 Ohio St. 3d 270

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 9, 2010

DocketNo. 2010-1435

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 128 Ohio St. 3d 270 (Reywal Co. v. City of Dublin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reywal Co. v. City of Dublin, 128 Ohio St. 3d 270 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed in judgment only on the authority of Campbell v. Carlisle, 127 Ohio St.3d 275, 2010-Ohio-5707, 939 N.E.2d 153, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for application of Campbell v. Carlisle.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer and Cupp, JJ., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed in judgment only on the authority of Campbell v. Carlisle, 127 Ohio St.3d 275, 2010-Ohio-5707, 939 N.E.2d 153, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for application of Campbell v. Carlisle.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer and Cupp, JJ., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 Ohio St. 3d 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reywal-co-v-city-of-dublin-ohio-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack