Reynoso v. Kuhlmann

235 A.D.2d 873, 652 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 518
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 23, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 235 A.D.2d 873 (Reynoso v. Kuhlmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reynoso v. Kuhlmann, 235 A.D.2d 873, 652 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 518 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kane, J.), entered March 14, 1996 in Sullivan County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule that prohibits lewd exposure and subsequently commenced the instant CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the administrative determination of his guilt. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, and petitioner appeals on the grounds that, inter alia, the requisite transcript of his disciplinary hearing was not submitted by respondent as required by CPLR 7804.

The record on appeal discloses no hearing transcript for our review, nor is there any indication that a hearing transcript was ever submitted for consideration by Supreme Court. The judgment is accordingly reversed and the matter is remitted for a determination of whether the transcript (required by 7 NYCRR 254.6 [b]) exists; in the event that it does, it is to be submitted by respondent for Supreme Court’s consideration (see, Matter of Jacob v Winch, 121 AD2d 446, 447).

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Crew III, White and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cliff v. Eagen
268 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D.2d 873, 652 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynoso-v-kuhlmann-nyappdiv-1997.