Reynoso v. Amin
This text of 33 A.D.3d 445 (Reynoso v. Amin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered October 12, 2005, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to reargue, denominated as one for “renewal and/or reargument,” unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.
Since plaintiffs did not offer any new or additional facts that would have changed the prior determination to dismiss, the motion was in essence one to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable (see Rosen v Rosenholc, 303 AD2d 230 [2003]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.R, Andrias, Sullivan, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 A.D.3d 445, 821 N.Y.S.2d 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynoso-v-amin-nyappdiv-2006.