Reynoso v. Amin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reynoso v. Amin

33 A.D.3d 445, 821 N.Y.S.2d 883

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 17, 2006·Published

Opinion

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered October 12, 2005, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to reargue, denominated as one for “renewal and/or reargument,” unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.

Since plaintiffs did not offer any new or additional facts that would have changed the prior determination to dismiss, the motion was in essence one to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable (see Rosen v Rosenholc, 303 AD2d 230 [2003]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.R, Andrias, Sullivan, McGuire and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered October 12, 2005, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to reargue, denominated as one for “renewal and/or reargument,” unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.

Since plaintiffs did not offer any new or additional facts that would have changed the prior determination to dismiss, the motion was in essence one to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable (see Rosen v Rosenholc, 303 AD2d 230 [2003]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.R, Andrias, Sullivan, McGuire and Malone, JJ.

Reynoso v. Amin, 33 A.D.3d 445, 821 N.Y.S.2d 883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

33 A.D.3d 445 (Reynoso v. Amin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related