Reynolds v. United States

Seventh Circuit

Reynolds v. United States

282 F. 860, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2712

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided April 21, 1922·No. No. 2927·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was adjudged guilty of contempt of coui’t for disobeying an injunctional order restraining him from maintaining a common nuisance in violation of the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305). The recent decisions of this court in Lewinsohn v. U. S., 278 Fed. 421; Allen v. U. S.. 278 Fed. 429, Grossman v. U. S., 280 Fed. 683, Shore v. U, S., 282 Fed. 857, and Heitler v. U. S., 280 Fed. 703, determine practically all of the assignments of error adversely to plaintiff in error.

[861]*861As to the remaining assignment of error, it appears that defendant did not take the stand to dispute the testimony offered by the government, and we are satisfied that the finding is supported by the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was adjudged guilty of contempt of coui’t for disobeying an injunctional order restraining him from maintaining a common nuisance in violation of the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305). The recent decisions of this court in Lewinsohn v. U. S., 278 Fed. 421; Allen v. U. S.. 278 Fed. 429, Grossman v. U. S., 280 Fed. 683, Shore v. U, S., 282 Fed. 857, and Heitler v. U. S., 280 Fed. 703, determine practically all of the assignments of error adversely to plaintiff in error.

[861]*861As to the remaining assignment of error, it appears that defendant did not take the stand to dispute the testimony offered by the government, and we are satisfied that the finding is supported by the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Reynolds v. United States, 282 F. 860, 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2712 (7th Cir. 1922).

Pincite

282 F. 860 (Reynolds v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related