Reynolds v. Timothy

96 A. 197, 29 Del. 17, 6 Boyce 17, 1915 Del. LEXIS 59
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedNovember 4, 1915
DocketNo. 16
StatusPublished

This text of 96 A. 197 (Reynolds v. Timothy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reynolds v. Timothy, 96 A. 197, 29 Del. 17, 6 Boyce 17, 1915 Del. LEXIS 59 (Del. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Conrad, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

The court followed with care the testimony of the witnesses and have listened attentively to all that has been said by counsel in the case, but we fail to see where any negligence has been shown on the part of the defendant that would render him liable for any injuries resulting to plaintiff.

[1, 2] The court always feels the greatest reluctance in taking a case from a jury, but it is the court’s duty to do so when plaintiff has failed to show any negligence upon the part of the defendant. The court is of the opinion that the evidence presented by the plaintiff clearly shows that the defendant at the time of the accident was in the exercise of all the care that a reasonably prudent man would or could have exercised under the circumstances.

We feel it our duty, therefore, to grant a nonsuit.

Mr. Anderson:—If your Honors please, the plaintiff refuses to accept a nonsuit.

Conrad, J., charging the jury:

For the reasons stated in the opinion the court has just announced, we direct you to find a verdict for the defendant.

Verdict for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 A. 197, 29 Del. 17, 6 Boyce 17, 1915 Del. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-timothy-delsuperct-1915.