Reynolds v. Teeters Brothers Contracting Co.
460 So. 2d 575, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 50, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16439
Opinion
Affirmed. Upon examination and review of the record we find that there is competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’s findings both as to the issue of rescission and the amount of any claims due one party from the other. Having made such a determination, we are without authority to disturb the rulings of the trial court challenged on appeal, regardless of our own views on the issues. Horn & Hardart, Florida, Inc. v. Dietz, 417 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reynolds v. Teeters Brothers Contracting Co., 460 So. 2d 575, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 50, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16439 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
460 So. 2d 575 (Reynolds v. Teeters Brothers Contracting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Horn & Hardart, Florida, Inc. v. Dietz
417 So. 2d 1039 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)