Home/California Supreme Court/Reynolds v. Superior Court

Reynolds v. Superior Court

28 P. 121, 64 Cal. 372, 12 P.C.L.J. 343, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 647
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 30, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by36 cases

This text of 28 P. 121 (Reynolds v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reynolds v. Superior Court, 28 P. 121, 64 Cal. 372, 12 P.C.L.J. 343, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 647 (Cal. 1883).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By means of certiorari the petitioner seeks to call in question the validity of a judgment and an order made and entered considerably more than one year before the presentation of his' petition. In Keys v. Marin County, 42 Cal. 256, it was held that unless circumstances of an extraordinary character be shown to have intervened, the remedy through a writ of certiorari should be held to be barred by the lapse of the same length of time that bars an appeal from a final judgment.

In the present case no excuse is shown for the delay in the application.

Writ denied and proceedings dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chung Kao v. Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
244 Cal. App. 4th 1326 (California Court of Appeal, 2016)
Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Superior Court
94 Cal. App. 4th 695 (California Court of Appeal, 2001)
MAURO B. v. Superior Court
230 Cal. App. 3d 949 (California Court of Appeal, 1991)
Popelka, Allard, McCowan & Jones v. Superior Court
107 Cal. App. 3d 496 (California Court of Appeal, 1980)
People v. Municipal Court (Mercer)
99 Cal. App. 3d 749 (California Court of Appeal, 1979)
Scott v. Municipal Court
40 Cal. App. 3d 995 (California Court of Appeal, 1974)
Simmons v. Superior Court
341 P.2d 13 (California Supreme Court, 1959)
Frantz v. State
1940 OK CR 108 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1940)
Patterson v. . R. R.
198 S.E. 364 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
Patterson v. Southern Railway Co.
214 N.C. 38 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
Ziemer v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.
22 F. Supp. 384 (D. Nevada, 1938)
Bryant v. Superior Court
61 P.2d 483 (California Court of Appeal, 1936)
Security-First National Bank v. Superior Court
23 P.2d 1055 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)
Hoxsey v. Baker
246 N.W. 653 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1933)
Lauchere v. Lambert
291 P. 412 (California Supreme Court, 1930)
Haynes v. Los Angeles Railroad Corp.
252 P. 1072 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
Warren People's Market Co. v. Corbett & Sons
151 N.E. 51 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1926)
Reid v. Superior Court
186 P. 634 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
Pullman Co. v. State Board of Equalization
171 P. 260 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1918)
Reichardt v. Hill
236 F. 817 (Sixth Circuit, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 P. 121, 64 Cal. 372, 12 P.C.L.J. 343, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reynolds-v-superior-court-cal-1883.